Today is the 16th April. It’s a reflective moment for me to think about a forthcoming meeting on 20th April 2009. This is the first of a number of ‘forum’ meetings which are set to take place with Arts Council England. It’s an opportunity to bring to you, the people who care about arts participation and voluntary and amateur arts exactly that which you have all been telling us you need… an opportunity to talk through the issues affecting your particular art form or craft.
I look forward to seeing those of you who can make it on the April 20th date, but don’t worry if you can’t there will be annual opportunities to meet with the strategic directors and CEO of ACE, and I’ll keep sending you the invitations to attend as they come up.
In the meantime below are a few of the agenda items as suggested by those attending the next meeting which will be discussed on the 20th. Perhaps you’d like to give your views, share your thoughts and experiences about what the issues below mean to you?
1. Valuing Amateur Arts Leaders and Practitioners
Whilst understanding and appreciating the usefulness of involving professionals, there is too often a requirement that they must be involved and paid a professional rate – which can take a high proportion of any grant offered. This issue needs to firstly be acknowledged by policy makers, and then by the major regional decision makers.
Without wishing to denigrate professionals, there are a huge number of very proficient and inspiring amateurs who are willing to contribute for smaller fees and/or just expenses.
a) What is your current experience with regard to involving professional artists in your amateur/voluntary arts events?
b) Is there an unfair demand or expectation?
c) How do we strike a balance of working across paid/ unpaid/ professional/ amateur remits?
d) What role do the venues and regularly funded organisations of the Arts Council have in this?
2. Strategic support
Very often amateur groups need relatively small sums of money to maintain basic services, such as communication and volunteer expenses. Whilst directed toward supporting arts activities, these sums are not always art-activity specific and therefore do not always fit wider grant criteria. A funding programme for this strategic support and development would be very useful I suspect for many amateur arts groups.
a) Where should support for this type of activity come from?
b) Is it an issue of semantics and a case of not knowing where to put certain types of expenditure? And therefore is training needed in how to make better grant applications?
c) What role do support organisations and grant givers have in helping organisations access funding?
d) What improvements could be made to grant giving in order to ensure generic activities are supported?
e) How do you (or should you) measure ‘return on investment’ when supporting, for example volunteer expenses as compared to say audiences?
3. Great art for everyone
Yes, I’ve deliberately taken the emphasis off the ‘great’ word and placed it on the word ‘for’.
We all know the arts are hugely subjective, what one person deems to be ‘great’ (whoever that person may be), another person thinks is positively mediocre.
Arts Council England tells us
“Our ambition is to put the arts at the heart of national life and people at the heart of the arts. Our aim is for everyone in the country to have the opportunity to develop a rich and varied artistic and creative life. We will ensure that more high-quality work reaches a wider range of people – engaging them as both audience and participants. We will support artists and arts organisations to take creative risks and follow new opportunities.” Source: www.artscouncil.org.uk accessed 16th April 2009.
a) What do you think about the idea of ‘great art for everyone’?
b) Where arts participation is concerned, is too much attention given to using the ‘qualitative’ argument? Is it used to relegate public, amateur and voluntary arts practice to a, ‘less than acceptable’ standard or is it ensuring we drive up the arts ‘experience’ for everyone?
c) How does the amateur/ voluntary arts sector contribute to ‘great’ art for everyone and the excellence agenda? Do you have examples of ‘great’ art?
4. Arts participation and Wellbeing
We are all aware of the mass of evidence that exists in the arts and ‘healthcare’ arena. What is perhaps less known is the wider, more holistic role the arts can play in the wellbeing agenda, and specifically where people on the margins of society are concerned. A ‘well’ society is one that cares for its elders, it’s infirm, it’s ‘less capable’ etc. Arts participation and creative expression unlock processes in the human psycho-spiritual self. This in turn can help ‘balance’ return. Balance on both an emotional and physiological level.
a) How can we improve the health and well being of people through active participation in painting? Especially those in care homes, hospices, hospitals day centres and one to one in people’s homes, through the use of tested methods and the use of staff and volunteers.
b) How can we capture credible, robust evidence from this (as many people’s health records for example are confidential)?
c) What role should the media play in pushing the concept of arts and wellbeing?
d) Is it all just ‘a placebo effect’?
I’m also interested to hear your thoughts on the topics below, which we’ll also cover in the forthcoming meeting.
Arts Education
Working together to increase participation
Opportunities in the Cultural Olympiad
Building Schools for the future
Empty Shops – using unused spaces for the arts – see: http://nds.coi.gov.uk/Content/Detail.asp?ReleaseID=398607&NewsAreaID=2
Now you’ve seen what we’ll be discussing, are we ‘way off the mark’? Is there another burning issue you want us to tackle? Let me know.